India slipped two places to 53rd position within the 2020 Democracy Index''s global ranking, consistent with The Economist Intelligence Unit, which said the "democratic backsliding" by authorities and "crackdowns" on civil liberties has led to an extra decline within the country''s ranking.
However, India is ranked above most of its neighbouring countries.
India''s overall score fell from 6.9 in 2019 to six .61 within the Index that gives a snapshot of the present state of democracy worldwide for 167 countries."With mounting pressure on India’s democratic norms, India’s score fell from a peak of seven .92 in 2014 to six .61 in 2020 and its global ranking slipped from 27th (in 2014) to 53rd as a results of democratic backsliding" under the present regime, The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) said.
Norway topped The Economist Intelligence Unit''s latest Democracy Index report titled "Democracy in sickness and in health?", with Iceland, Sweden, New Zealand and Canada making up the highest five.
Out of 167 countries, the Democracy Index classifies 23 countries as full democracies, 52 as flawed democracies, 35 as hybrid regimes and 57 as authoritarian regimes. India has been classified as a ''flawed democracy'' along side countries like the US, France, Belgium and Brazil.
The EIU report said that in India and Thailand, "democratic backsliding by the authorities and crackdowns on civil liberties led to an extra decline in their global rankings".It further alleged that the Narendra Modi-led government has "introduced a spiritual element to the conceptualisation of Indian citizenship, a step that a lot of critics see as undermining the secular basis of the Indian state".
"The authorities’ handling of the coronavirus pandemic led to an extra erosion of civil liberties in 2020," the report said.India was ranked 51st within the 2019 Democracy Index.
Among India''s neighbours, while Sri Lanka , at 68th rank, is assessed as a flawed democracy, Bangladesh (76), Bhutan (84) and Pakistan (105) are classified within the ''hybrid regime'' category. Afghanistan is ranked 139th and classified as an ''authoritarian regime'' within the index.
The EIU report looks at the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on freedom and democracy round the world.
The Asia and Australasia region includes top-scoring New Zealand, which retained its fourth position within the global ranking (out of 167 countries), and protracted laggard North Korea at rock bottom of the worldwide ranking in 167th place, the EIU said during a statement.
The region’s overall score fell in 2020, but it now has five “full democracies” with Japan, South Korea and Taiwan moving up the rankings compared with 2019.Australia retains its “full democracy” status and high ranking (9th).
Japan and South Korea both returned to the “full democracy” fold for the primary time since 2014. Taiwan attained “full democracy” status for the primary time following a spectacular jump up the rankings.
Despite these upgrades, Asia’s average regional score deteriorated to its lowest level since 2013 as official measures taken to combat the coronavirus pandemic led to a number of the foremost severe constraints on individual freedoms and civil liberties within the world, the EIU said.
China, Singapore et al. went much further than the remainder of the planet in tracking and policing their citizens and locking them down in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, it said.
Joan Hoey, Editor of The Economist Intelligence Unit''s annual Democracy Index report, said, "The symbolism of Asia gaining three new ''full democracies'' in 2020 and western Europe losing two (France and Portugal) was apt, because the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the shift within the global balance of power from the West to the East."
"Asia continues to lag behind the West in democratic terms having only five ''full democracies'', compared with western Europe’s 13, but the region has, so far, handled the pandemic far better than virtually the other , with lower infection and mortality rates and a quick economic rebound," she said.Asian governments reacted decisively (albeit deploying coercive powers in some cases), benefited from well-organised health systems and retained the arrogance of their populations, she said.